Posts Tagged ‘cnn’

Excess of Fear?

March 14, 2009

There are “modestly encouraging signs” on that score, said Lawrence Summers, Obama’s top economic adviser, citing indications that consumer spending had stabilized after taking a dive over the holiday season.

The stimulus plan, Summers said, is already saving thousands of public employee jobs, including as many as 14,000 teachers in New York alone, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid. But he stressed that a full turnaround could still be a long way off, and said it will happen only when Americans overcome their “excess of fear.”

Those are the words of Obama’s top economic adviser Lawrence Summers.

Excess of Fear!

Try telling that to the over 12.5 million Americans ( Current U.S. population U.S. 306,007,05217:47 GMT (EST+5) Mar 14, 2009   )
that have lost their jobs and homes, many of which are now occupying Tent Cities across the nation. Many struggling Americans are now calling tent cities their homes.
Think about that for just a moment and while you are at it take a look at this video:  Unemployed Americans turn to tents (ABC News)

And here is another:

Tent cities spring up in LA

I saw this video and it was exactly like something out of the Grapes of Wrath!!! Chilling to say the least.

Tent cities are popping up just about everywhere in these times. Here is a report Sacramento and Seattle:

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Tent Cities Sprouting in Sacramento and Seattle

Then there is this headline:

President Voices Optimism For Economic Growth But Says “Difficult Period” Is Not Over

You better believe the Difficult Period is not over. It took years to get here via the Bush administration and I can bet it will take years to get out of it, so if anyone is expecting all that stimulus money to turn this around on a dime they are sadly mistaking.

As far as I have been able to tell I don’t think we have even hit bottom yet! We are still in a slow motion fall down a cliff. No doubt President Obama knows this and is why he is being cautious in what he tells the American Public and in essence the world.

We have to get past the state of denial and admit that we are in fact in a Depression ( let us forget the technicalities ) we are there and the sooner we face it the sooner we can get things moving along and re-structure the system and truly begin to help those that are suffering on a daily basis from an economic crisis that was brought about by greed!

Angry Laid-Off Workers Occupy Factory in Chicago

December 8, 2008

Monday, December 8, 2008
by Rupa Shenoy

CHICAGO – Workers who got three days’ notice that their factory was shutting its doors have occupied the building and say they won’t go home without assurances they’ll get severance and vacation pay.
About 250 union workers occupied the Republic Windows and Doors plant in shifts Saturday while union leaders outside criticized a Wall Street bailout they say is leaving laborers behind.

I have been hearing about this over the weekend on CNN and gave it some thought at length. It suddenly dawned on me that this might turn out to be a blue print or working model for other manufacturers looking to get out during this economic crisis, so I did some checking on the WARN ACT.  Here it is:

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
A Guide to Advance Notice of Closings and Layoffs
http://www.doleta.gov/programs/factsht/warn.htm

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) was enacted on August 4, 1988 and became effective on February 4, 1989.
General Provisions
WARN offers protection to workers, their families and communities by requiring employers to provide notice 60 days in advance of covered plant closings and covered mass layoffs. This notice must be provided to either affected workers or their representatives (e.g., a labor union); to the State dislocated worker unit; and to the appropriate unit of local government.
Employer Coverage
In general, employers are covered by WARN if they have 100 or more employees, not counting employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months and not counting employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week. Private, for-profit employers and private, nonprofit employers are covered, as are public and quasi-public entities which operate in a commercial context and are separately organized from the regular government. Regular Federal, State, and local government entities which provide public services are not covered.
Employee Coverage
Employees entitled to notice under WARN include hourly and salaried workers, as well as managerial and supervisory employees. Business partners are not entitled to notice.
What Triggers Notice
Plant Closing: A covered employer must give notice if an employment site (or one or more facilities or operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, and the shutdown will result in an employment loss (as defined later) for 50 or more employees during any 30-day period. This does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).
Mass Layoff: A covered employer must give notice if there is to be a mass layoff which does not result from a plant closing, but which will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period for 500 or more employees, or for 50-499 employees if they make up at least 33% of the employer’s active workforce. Again, this does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).
An employer also must give notice if the number of employment losses which occur during a 30-day period fails to meet the threshold requirements of a plant closing or mass layoff, but the number of employment losses for 2 or more groups of workers, each of which is less than the minimum number needed to trigger notice, reaches the threshold level, during any 90-day period, of either a plant closing or mass layoff. Job losses within any 90-day period will count together toward WARN threshold levels, unless the employer demonstrates that the employment losses during the 90-day period are the result of separate and distinct actions and causes.
Sale of Businesses
In a situation involving the sale of part or all of a business, the following requirements apply. (1) In each situation, there is always an employer responsible for giving notice. (2) If the sale by a covered employer results in a covered plant closing or mass layoff, the required parties (discussed later) must receive at least 60 days notice. (3) The seller is responsible for providing notice of any covered plant closing or mass layoff which occurs up to and including the date/time of the sale. (4) The buyer is responsible for providing notice of any covered plant closing or mass layoff which occurs after the date/time of the sale. (5) No notice is required if the sale does not result in a covered plant closing or mass layoff. (6) Employees of the seller (other than employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week) on the date/time of the sale become, for purposes of WARN, employees of the buyer immediately following the sale. This provision preserves the notice rights of the employees of a business that has been sold.
Employment Loss
The term “employment loss” means:
(1) An employment termination, other than a discharge for cause, voluntary departure, or retirement;
(2) a layoff exceeding 6 months; or
(3) a reduction in an employee’s hours of work of more than 50% in each month of any 6-month period.
Exceptions: An employee who refuses a transfer to a different employment site within reasonable commuting distance does not experience an employment loss. An employee who accepts a transfer outside this distance within 30 days after it is offered or within 30 days after the plant closing or mass layoff, whichever is later, does not experience an employment loss. In both cases, the transfer offer must be made before the closing or layoff, there must be no more than a 6 month break in employment, and the new job must not be deemed a constructive discharge. These transfer exceptions from the “employment loss” definition apply only if the closing or layoff results from the relocation or consolidation of part or all of the employer’s business.
Exemptions
An employer does not need to give notice if a plant closing is the closing of a temporary facility, or if the closing or mass layoff is the result of the completion of a particular project or undertaking. This exemption applies only if the workers were hired with the understanding that their employment was limited to the duration of the facility, project or undertaking. An employer cannot label an ongoing project “temporary” in order to evade its obligations under WARN.
An employer does not need to provide notice to strikers or to workers who are part of the bargaining unit(s) which are involved in the labor negotiations that led to a lockout when the strike or lockout is equivalent to a plant closing or mass layoff. Non-striking employees who experience an employment loss as a direct or indirect result of a strike and workers who are not part of the bargaining unit(s) which are involved in the labor negotiations that led to a lockout are still entitled to notice.
An employer does not need to give notice when permanently replacing a person who is an “economic striker” as defined under the National Labor Relations Act.
Who Must Receive Notice
The employer must give written notice to the chief elected officer of the exclusive representative(s) or bargaining agency(s) of affected employees and to unrepresented individual workers who may reasonably be expected to experience an employment loss. This includes employees who may lose their employment due to “bumping,” or displacement by other workers, to the extent that the employer can identify those employees when notice is given. If an employer cannot identify employees who may lose their jobs through bumping procedures, the employer must provide notice to the incumbents in the jobs which are being eliminated. Employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months and employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week are due notice, even though they are not counted when determining the trigger levels.
The employer must also provide notice to the State dislocated worker unit and to the chief elected official of the unit of local government in which the employment site is located.
Notification Period
With three exceptions, notice must be timed to reach the required parties at least 60 days before a closing or layoff. When the individual employment separations for a closing or layoff occur on more than one day, the notices are due to the representative(s), State dislocated worker unit and local government at least 60 days before each separation. If the workers are not represented, each worker’s notice is due at least 60 days before that worker’s separation.
The exceptions to 60-day notice are:
(1) Faltering company. This exception, to be narrowly construed, covers situations where a company has sought new capital or business in order to stay open and where giving notice would ruin the opportunity to get the new capital or business, and applies only to plant closings;
(2) unforeseeable business circumstances. This exception applies to closings and layoffs that are caused by business circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable at the time notice would otherwise have been required; and
(3) Natural disaster. This applies where a closing or layoff is the direct result of a natural disaster, such as a flood, earthquake, drought or storm.
If an employer provides less than 60 days advance notice of a closing or layoff and relies on one of these three exceptions, the employer bears the burden of proof that the conditions for the exception have been met. The employer also must give as much notice as is practicable. When the notices are given, they must include a brief statement of the reason for reducing the notice period in addition to the items required in notices.
Form and Content of Notice
No particular form of notice is required. However, all notices must be in writing. Any reasonable method of delivery designed to ensure receipt 60 days before a closing or layoff is acceptable.
Notice must be specific. Notice may be given conditionally upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event only when the event is definite and its occurrence or nonoccurrence will result in a covered employment action less than 60 days after the event.
The content of the notices to the required parties is listed in section 639.7 of the WARN final regulations. Additional notice is required when the date(s) or 14-day period(s) for a planned plant closing or mass layoff are extended beyond the date(s) or 14-day period(s) announced in the original notice.
Record
No particular form of record is required. The information employers will use to determine whether, to whom, and when they must give notice is information that employers usually keep in ordinary business practices and in complying with other laws and regulations.
Penalties
An employer who violates the WARN provisions by ordering a plant closing or mass layoff without providing appropriate notice is liable to each aggrieved employee for an amount including back pay and benefits for the period of violation, up to 60 days. The employer’s liability may be reduced by such items as wages paid by the employer to the employee during the period of the violation and voluntary and unconditional payments made by the employer to the employee.
An employer who fails to provide notice as required to a unit of local government is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $500 for each day of violation. This penalty may be avoided if the employer satisfies the liability to each aggrieved employee within 3 weeks after the closing or layoff is ordered by the employer.
Enforcement
Enforcement of WARN requirements is through the United States district courts. Workers, representatives of employees and units of local government may bring individual or class action suits. In any suit, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.
Information
Specific requirements of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act may be found in the Act itself, Public Law 100-379 (29 U.S.C. 210l, et seq.) The Department of Labor published final regulations on April 20, 1989 in the Federal Register (Vol. 54, No. 75). The regulations appear at 20 CFR Part 639.

General questions on the regulations may be addressed to:
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
Office of Work-Based Learning
Room N-5426
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

(202) 219-5577

The Department of Labor, since it has no administrative or enforcement responsibility under WARN, cannot provide specific advice or guidance with respect to individual situations.

Related news:

Chicago labor sit-in captures support from Obama

CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) — A weekend sit-in by laid-off workers at a Chicago window factory drew high-profile support from President-elect Barack Obama ahead of a Monday meeting between union leaders and the plant’s major creditor.

About 200 workers from the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America have conducted what they call a “peaceful occupation” of the Republic Windows and Doors plant since Friday, when their abruptly announced layoffs were supposed to take effect.

The workers said Republic told them Bank of America had cut off credit to the company and gave them three days’ notice that they were losing their jobs. Federal law requires either 60 days’ notice or 60 days’ pay for the laid-off workers. More…

Citi dodges bullet

November 25, 2008

Government will guarantee losses on more than $300 billion in troubled assets and make a fresh $20 billion injection.

By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: November 24, 2008: 1:34 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The U.S. government on Sunday announced a massive rescue package for Citigroup – the latest move to steady the banking giant, whose shares plunged in the past week on fears about the bank’s health.
The plan has two key features:

First, the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will backstop some losses against more than $300 billion in troubled assets.

Second, the Treasury will make a fresh $20 billion investment in the bank. The government has already injected $25 billion into Citigroup as part of the $700 billion bailout passed by Congress in October.

Now everyone is familiar with the AIG bailout but here is one of the press releases to get a better picture:

Press Release

Federal Reserve Press Release

Release Date: September 16, 2008

For release at 9:00 p.m. EDT

The Federal Reserve Board on Tuesday, with the full support of the Treasury Department, authorized the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to lend up to $85 billion to the American International Group (AIG) under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve ActThe secured loan has terms and conditions designed to protect the interests of the U.S. government and taxpayers.

Now, here is the real slap in the face to the people ( taxpayers )  who have to foot the bill in taxes; what are they planning on doing with some of that money?

Here is a breakdown:
CNN reports that AIG will spend $125m on Manchester United team sponsorship.
Citigroup to spend $400m on naming rights for Mets Stadium

Don’t ask me for the links because I have searched all over and could not find them. It was however on CNN this morning ( Nov. 25, 2008 ) and they even had a poll. Maybe CNN will provide a link to that story! How about it Jennifer, Robin?

Boy, what a slap in the face! First they come with tin cups begging for money then they get it and begin planning on using some of it on Sports!!!

Here is a good question: Does that mean that the government will get the sponsorship or naming rights if they go belly up? Wow! What a Freudian Nightmare!

3/1 CNN Your Money: Talks of Great Depression Coming

November 23, 2008

This is a very interesting and I might add scary video I found over at YouTube while doing some research on the Depression. This was posted on March 1, 2008 and today is November 23, 2008 and you can tell from this video how things have deteriorated up to date.  Just a few days ago it was reported that Citigroup would be laying off over 50,000 workers!  The Big 3 auto makers are still battling to get funds from Congress. Banks continue to close. Businesses continue to go out of business. It was only recently that the government admitted to a recession. A RECESSION? Where do these people live? Have they no eye’s? What about The People?

What about The People?

3/1 CNN Your Money: Talks of Great Depression Coming

Get ready for the price of gold to soar after this type of story in mainstream! John Williams discusses a coming financial depression. Many financial experts outside of mainstream has spoken about an economic collapse for years; such as Bob Chapman from http://theinternationalforecaster.com/

The percentage of elected officials saying their community has experienced the following over the past year:

Increase in foreclosures: 62%
Increase in need for temporary assistance: 53%
Decrease in city revenue: 33%
Increase in abandoned/vacant properties: 33%
Increase in homelessness: 22%

Source: National League of Cities’ Insta-Poll of 1,240 local officials, based on 211 responses

It will only get worse, but they’ve already have a plan for you. You’ll be introduced to a regional currency ‘Amero’ then eventually a global currency. Hey, I’m not a prophet, I just read what they speak of. Sadly, many of you will fall to the deception because of your coming economic demise. Unfortunately, It shouldn’t have come to this, but many of you are slaves to group blaming. (Republican vs. democrat, conservative vs. liberal, etc)
The End of National Currency
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/2007050…

“Being ahead of the masses in your observations of economic trends is no way to win a popularity contest. If you’re 30 days ahead of the masses, you’re considered a genius; but if you’re two years ahead, you’re considered insane. It makes me wonder about the experiences of historical geniuses like Nikola Tesla, since they were at least a hundred years ahead in their understanding of science.” -Mike Adams

Please explore these articles: ( Please go to the YouTube site as the number of links are many and would take up space here ) Click Here